| ID | Referenced By | label | talker | talkattr | talkattr2 | talkattr3 | style | name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | <D00CC92E> | e1 | 0x8100 | 0x4081 | 0x430 | 126 | This contraption's caught your eye, has it? | |
| 2 | <A44F8308> | c1 | 0x8100 | 0x4081 | 0x430 | 126 | Ah, yes. Someone mentioned before that it's not in working order. |
|
| 3 | <E0615842> | c1 | 0x8100 | 0x4081 | 0x430 | 126 | I was just thinking, maybe if we replaced a few of the parts, it might be possible to get it running again. |
|
| 4 | <B33C38D8> | e1 | 0x8100 | 0x4081 | 0x430 | 126 | Now you mention it, if we got this thing working again, we'd be able to process gems to a higher degree of purity... |
|
| 5 | <6462DC71> | e1 | 0x8100 | 0x4081 | 0x430 | 126 | And if we could incorporate the tech into our portable version, it might be a huge step up for us. |
|
| 6 | <9EE54F02> | a1 | 0x8100 | 0x4081 | 0x430 | 126 | Can't knock a good gem setup when you're in a scrap. If we can get 'em powered up, I say we go for it! |
|
| 7 | <AD49FE09> | e1 | 0x8100 | 0x4081 | 0x430 | 126 | Agreed. Given the opportunity, it'd be a good investment of our time. Shall we give it a go, then? |
|
| 8 | <C5F0EA3B> | c1 | 0x8100 | 0x4081 | 0x430 | 126 | Yessir! | |
| 9 | <2ADFC59F> | e1 | 0x8100 | 0x4081 | 0x430 | 126 | I don't see anything immediately wrong with it from the exterior. We could start by replacing some of the internal mechanisms. |
|
| 10 | <4A8E0270> | e1 | 0x8100 | 0x4081 | 0x430 | 126 | It might be the heat regulator that's malfunctioning. It's what raises the gem purity. |
|
| 11 | <F3A4E259> | c1 | 0x8100 | 0x4081 | 0x430 | 126 | I see your point... Let's look into it. |